Current Access Level “I” – ID Only: CUID holders, alumni, and approved guests only
Get the latest as our experts share their insights on global energy policy.
CGEP scholars reflect on some of the standout issues of the day during this year's Climate Week
Hear in-depth conversations with the world’s top energy and climate leaders from government, business, academia, and civil society.
Trade tensions between the US and China have hit a new high mark. Last week, after China announced plans to ratchet up its export controls of some rare-earths...
Find out more about our upcoming and past events.
Join us for a virtual information session focused on career pathways at the United Nations.
External Publications by Jason Bordoff • August 25, 2017
Writing in Nature Energy, Jason Bordoff argues that the Trump administration’s domestic plans would have curtailed the nation’s climate action even if it had stayed in the Paris Agreement. Yet, the decision to leave the agreement undermines US international energy and climate leadership and the prospects of ramping up global climate policy ambition.
This article was originally published in Nature Energy (25 AUGUST 2017 | VOLUME: 2 | ARTICLE NUMBER: 171455). It is posted here in full with permission.
CGEP scholars reflect on some of the standout issues of the day during this year's Climate Week
World leaders are meeting in New York this month at the request of the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres to discuss the state of global ambition on climate change.
A key component of the Paris Agreement is Article 6, which introduces a framework to facilitate voluntary cooperation between―primarily using carbon credit trading―to help achieve their nationally determined contributions (NDCs) more cost-effectively.
Full report
External Publications by Jason Bordoff • August 25, 2017