EU on track to phase out Russian gas by 2028 but supply challenges remain
- Careful coordination, infrastructure development, and diversified supplies crucial to ensure smooth EU transition - Anadolu Agency
Current Access Level “I” – ID Only: CUID holders, alumni, and approved guests only
Reports by Tom Moerenhout, Cina Vazir & Irina Patrahau • July 09, 2025
This report represents the research and views of the authors. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. The piece may be subject to further revision. 
Contributions to SIPA for the benefit of CGEP are general use gifts, which gives the Center discretion in how it allocates these funds. More information is available here. Rare cases of sponsored projects are clearly indicated.
Corporate Partnerships
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Tellurian Inc.
Foundations and Individual Donors
Anonymous
Anonymous
Aphorism Foundation
the bedari collective
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation
David Leuschen
Mike and Sofia Segal
Kimberly and Scott Sheffield
Bernard and Anne Spitzer Charitable Trust
Ray Rothrock
The United States is at a pivotal moment to modernize its approach to critical mineral stockpiling. Minerals are increasingly central to American strategic interests, yet the US remains heavily reliant on foreign suppliers, particularly China, for processed materials. This dependency exposes the US to major vulnerabilities in national, economic, and climate security. The National Defense Stockpile (NDS) can be a key policy lever to reduce these vulnerabilities. At present, however, the NDS is underfunded, covering only a fraction of projected needs in a national emergency. It also may not be realizing its potential to address underlying market failures that threaten US economic interests in addition to its historical defense role.
This report, part of the Critical Materials Initiative at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA, finds that an economic stockpile with market-shaping quantities of material may cost more than six times the amount of a defense-oriented stockpile. It is therefore important to integrate stockpiling choices into the wider array of policy options, analyzing whether a stockpile is the most efficient tool to address the specific market failure at hand for each material and transaction.
The report outlines five foundational choices if a stockpiling strategy is adopted, as bipartisan support suggests is possible, and offers related recommendations for US policymakers designing such a system:
The US would need to ensure that the NDS is properly funded to meet its current mandate before considering expanding its scope to industrial resilience and economic security, which would require additional sustained investment over decades rather than a one-off appropriation. But the country does face an important window to align mineral stockpiles with the strategic landscape of the 21st century. A well-designed system can reduce supply chain vulnerabilities, support domestic and allied industries, and enhance America’s geopolitical leverage.
The new critical minerals agreement between Japan and the US is more than yet another bilateral trade announcement.
 
        
	The Trump administration is increasingly using equity investments as a tool of industrial policy to support domestic critical minerals supply chains.
 
        
	This special CGEP blog series, featuring six contributions from CGEP scholars, analyzes the potential impacts of the OBBBA across a range of sectors.
 
        
	Full report
Reports by Tom Moerenhout, Cina Vazir & Irina Patrahau • July 09, 2025