Current Access Level “I” – ID Only: CUID holders, alumni, and approved guests only
Get the latest as our experts share their insights on global energy policy.
Saudi Arabia’s recent moves into the liquefied natural gas (LNG) market may be a sign the giant oil exporter is looking to expand into a rapidly growing and politically influential market it had long ignored.
Hear in-depth conversations with the world’s top energy and climate leaders from government, business, academia, and civil society.
We often associate energy poverty with developing nations, but the reality is that tens of millions of Americans struggle to pay their monthly energy bills. Oftentimes, they forgo...
Find out more about our upcoming and past events.
Join us for a virtual information session focused on career pathways at the World Bank, one of the world’s leading international financial institutions dedicated to poverty reduction and...
Commentary by Jonathan Elkind • June 01, 2017
Download the Full Commentary (PDF)
In the run up to the November 2017 International Energy Agency (IEA) ministerial meeting in Paris, Jonathan Elkind, a Fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy, writes on the importance of the new U.S. Administration to lead the charge in modernizing the IEA. Despite criticism from President Trump about the efficacy of international organizations and his championing of an “America First” energy policy, Elkind urges the president and his team to not waste an opportunity to invest wisely in an institution that has not only served the United States and its partners well for more than forty years, but has great potential to continue to do so in the next forty.
Following an overview of IEA’s history and benefits the organization has brought to its members, Elkind writes that just as the energy world has changed since the IEA’s inception in 1974, so too must the IEA change and adapt to the new global energy paradigm. He notes that the organization has already begun to take steps in the direction of modernization–at the last ministerial meeting in 2015, members endorsed a three-part program including, “enhanced engagement with major emerging economies, strengthened and broadened commitment to energy security, and greater focus on clean energy technology, including energy efficiency.” But, despite this progress, U.S. activism and leadership is pivotal to successful modernization of the organization, both because the United States is the IEA’s largest shareholder and because the U.S. will play a key role engaging closely with member countries and partners to forge a strong deal and to keep focused on essential elements of the modernization process.
When considering options to move forward, Elkind maps out two paths. The first, which would create a new, broader organization untethered to the OECD, would not be in the interest of the United States or other IEA members because it would require a significant amount of time, staff bandwidth, and funding. The alternative, and better option, involves the U.S sustaining the IEA by ensuring it stays focused on today’s top-most energy challenges and providing a path to membership for those countries wishing to become members.
Steps by the second Trump administration show it is taking a tougher stance against the regime of Nicolas Maduro. Trump recently issued an executive order that could levy a 25 percent tariff on countries that directly or indirectly import Venezuelan oil starting on April 2, and it has modified Chevron’s oil license to operate in the South American nation.
Trump’s abandonment of antibribery efforts will hurt—not help—U.S. companies.
Full report
Commentary by Jonathan Elkind • June 01, 2017