This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors’ experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University’s usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.
Energy Explained
Get the latest as our experts share their insights on global energy policy.
EU’s Proposed Tariffs on Steel to Address Excess Capacity and Enable Decarbonization Could Worsen Trade Tensions
The European Commission released a proposed regulation on Oct. 7 that would replace the EU's existing "safeguard" duties on imported steel products set to expire in June 2026.
Podcasts
Hear in-depth conversations with the world’s top energy and climate leaders from government, business, academia, and civil society.
‘The Return of the Energy Weapon’
Energy has long been used as a weapon. The United Kingdom blocked oil exports to Germany during World War I. Hitler’s fall was due in part to losing...
Events
Find out more about our upcoming and past events.
October 27, 2025
• 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm
edt
Rapid Response: Unpacking Recent Sanctions on Russian Oil
On October 22, the United States Department of the Treasury announced the imposition of sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil, as a penalty for...
Webinar
• Webinar
News
MARKET VIEW: Arb Window Will Have to Go Deeply Negative to Shut-In US LNG Exports
May 6, 2019
Energy Intelligence
MARKET VIEW: Arb Window Will Have to Go Deeply Negative to Shut-In US LNG Exports
*This article is reprinted with permission from Energy Intelligence Group.*
With spot LNG pricing at multi-year lows in both Europe and Asia, and the arbitrage window for US LNG remaining narrow, market observers have returned to the question of whether US export terminals will see shut-ins – and if so, would it matter?
“We have come close to testing US export capacity utilization under substantial price pressure in 2016, but US LNG exports were only beginning to ramp up back then,” said Akos Losz, senior research associate at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. But now, many first wave US LNG projects are either online or in the commissioning phase, which changes the dynamic.
“If overseas prices continue to decline in the months ahead, then we might once again put the system to the test, this time in a more mature stage of the industry,” Losz told Energy Intelligence (NGW Jan.7’19).
But does this mean there would be capacity shut-ins, with offtakers ceasing to lift US LNG cargoes in the face of a negative export arbitrage? The answer is “complex” said Losz. “US LNG supply is probably more resilient to short-term market imbalances than simple netback economics would suggest.”
A decision to stop lifting cargoes depends a lot on the individual conditions for each market player. Losz said the theoretical shut-in point – based on the standard tolling formula of 115% of Henry Hub plus a fixed fee – is not close at hand.
“Prices have still some way to fall,” he said, suggesting that European gas prices would need to drop below the $4/MMBtu level for shut-ins across the Atlantic to enter the conversation. Europe at $4 is “a very low price level by historical standards.”
The shut-in point certainly looked close last week with UK NBP was seen around $4.35/MMBtu. Henry Hub Nymex was around $2.60, which would put the cost of US Gulf Coast gas at $5.99, according to a typical tolling arrangement – 115% times Henry Hub plus a fixed tolling fee of $3. The arbitrage window for Europe therefore comes out at negative $1.64/MMBtu, without counting shipping costs.
However, not every seller faces this money-losing equation, and most will continue selling if marginal costs are covered, if not their total costs.
“Some exporters source their feed gas at well below Henry Hub, and thus they will probably not stop lifting cargoes even when the arb seems marginally negative on a Henry Hub basis,” said Losz. For example, Permian Basin gas, which will feed the Texas Gulf Coast LNG projects, was trading last week at just 12¢ for Waha Hub monthly supply thanks to a persistent gas glut (NGW Apr.29’19).
Also, “some exporters will have long-term arrangements for pipeline and shipping capacity, so the transportation cost in their case will also be a sunk cost,” he said.
“Different types of players will have different abilities to actively trade and optimize their gas portfolio when the arb closes,” Losz explained. Companies most able to scale back exports to optimize their positions – portfolio players or pioneer Cheniere Energy, for example – “are the least likely to have to, because their variable costs are probably lower than for others.”
The marketing arms of the terminal operations – ie., Cheniere Marketing and eventually Tellurian Marketing – “may be willing to take the rejected cargoes off the hands of their customers and keep exporting, even if the offtakers decide to not export due to unfavorable economics.”
There are also contractual limitations to rejecting US LNG cargos on short notice. Losz explained that contracts might require offtakers to notify terminal operators several weeks or months in advance if they want to underlift their contracted volumes. As a result, offtakers would have to be reasonably confident that the arb will stay closed for at least a few months before it decides not to lift a cargo.
“Overall, I think the arb will have to fall deep into the negative, or stay marginally negative, for an extended period of time before we actually see capacity curtailments at the US export terminals,” Losz concluded.
Not everyone shares that view. “As European inventories approach full, the global gas markets will likely have to price low enough to turn off at least some US LNG exports,” said the Bank of America Merrill Lynch in a research note. “The timing could be especially bad for US markets, as the 2 Bcf/d Gulf Coast Express pipeline is targeting an in-service date of October 2019, allowing cheap Permian gas to reach the Gulf” (NGW Apr.29’19).
***
The Natural Gas Week composite spot wellhead price this week is $1.50/MMBtu, 11¢ more than last week and 21¢ less than the May 7, 2018, average. The spot delivered-to-pipeline price this week is $2.25/MMBtu, 7¢ more than last week and 5¢ less than last year’s corresponding average.
Michael Sultan, Washington
Related
More News
LNG exports throw lifeline to coal plants
Natural gas prices are rising as the U.S. exports more LNG. That has created an opening for the coal industry.
L’UE trace la voie à une interdiction progressive du gaz russe d’ici 2028
L'essentiel de l'actualité du gaz naturel, des gaz renouvelables et de l'hydrogène
Relevant
Publications
Carbon Competitiveness: Industry Steps Up as Global Priorities Shift
Economic, political, and fiscal realities have shifted energy policy priorities across the globe toward the goals of affordability and competitiveness.
Six Key Issues That Defined Climate Week 2025
CGEP scholars reflect on some of the standout issues of the day during this year's Climate Week
Blog
by Erica Downs, Dave Turk, Kate Guy, Gautam Jain, Luisa Palacios, David Sandalow, Vivek Shastry & Jack Andreasen Cavanaugh • October 10, 2025
Trends and 2025 Insights on the Rise of Electric Vehicles in the USA
Plug-in electric vehicles (EVs) are reshaping the transportation energy landscape, providing a practical alternative to petroleum fuels for a growing number of applications. EV sales grew 55× in the past decade (2014–2024) and 6× since 2020, driven by technological progress enabled by policies to reduce transportation emissions as well as industrial plans motivated by strategic value of EVs for global competitiveness, jobs and geopolitics. In 2024, 22% of passenger cars sold globally were EVs and opportunities for EVs beyond on-road applications are growing, including solutions to electrify off-road vehicles, maritime and aviation. This Review updates and expands our 2020 assessment of the scientific literature and describes the current status and future projections of EV markets, charging infrastructures, vehicle–grid integration and supply chains in the USA. EV is the lowest-emission motorized on-road transportation option, with life-cycle emissions decreasing as electricity emissions continue to decrease. Charging infrastructure grew in line with EV adoption but providing ubiquitous reliable and convenient charging remains a challenge. EVs are reducing electricity costs in several US markets and coordinated EV charging can improve grid resilience and reduce electricity costs for all consumers. The current trajectory of technology improvement and industrial investments points to continued acceleration of EVs. Electric vehicles are increasingly adopted in the USA, with concurrent expansion of charging infrastructure and electricity demand. This Review details these trends and discusses their drivers and broader implications.
