Current Access Level “I” – ID Only: CUID holders, alumni, and approved guests only
Get the latest as our experts share their insights on global energy policy.
This Energy Explained post represents the research and views of the author. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. The piece...
Hear in-depth conversations with the world’s top energy and climate leaders from government, business, academia, and civil society.
As President Biden’s national security advisor, Jake Sullivan laid out a strategy for what he called a “foreign policy for the middle class.” Using the metaphor of a...
Find out more about our upcoming and past events.
Please join the Women in Energy initiative at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia SIPA for a public roundtable featuring Claire Steichen, Founder of Clear Strategy Coaching. The fast-evolving energy...
Q&A by Tom Moerenhout • December 07, 2021
While oil demand saw its biggest ever decline in 2020 because of COVID-19 lockdowns, it rebounded quickly in 2021. Transportation is responsible for 24 percent of direct carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fuel combustion.[1] In the United States, transport accounts for 29 percent[2] of all greenhouse gas emissions. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has warned that even with more efficient vehicles being adopted, transport sector emissions have been growing fast, which prompted calls by the body for more aggressive and sustained mitigation options.[3] Since more than 40 percent of all transport-related carbon emissions come from passenger road vehicles,[4] deeper market penetration of especially electric vehicles is considered a priority.
In this piece, the Center on Global Energy Policy’s Dr. Tom Moerenhout discusses EV commitments made at the recent COP26 in Glasgow and whether those are sufficient to meet the massive challenge of converting the global vehicle fleet from fossil-fuel dependence.
Q. What was the key commitment around electric vehicles at COP 26?
A. The strongest commitment in the EV space consisted of a declaration by a group of stakeholders with influence over the automotive industry to accelerate the transition to zero-emission vehicles, including cars and vans (see Table 1).[5] Generally, the goal is to have all new sales of cars and vans be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) by 2035 in leading markets, with exceptions for signatories from emerging and developing country governments.
Table 1: Summary of EV commitments at COP26
Q. Which countries were absent, and what does that signal?
A. Countries with large automobile manufacturing industries such as the United States, China, Germany, and Japan did not yet sign on to the commitment. That, however, does not necessarily mean there is a lack of progress within these countries. In the US, three states and eight large cities did sign up to the commitment. This included California, New York, and Washington State, as well as Ann Arbor, Atlanta, Charleston, Los Angeles, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Seattle.[6] Key automobile companies from these countries that are leading the EV charge and that signed on to the commitment included Ford (US), General Motors (US), BYD (China), and Mercedes-Benz (Germany).[7]
Q. What countries are currently leading in electric vehicle adoption?
A. About 90 percent of all electric vehicles in operation are found in China, Europe, and the United States.[8] EV adoption has been rising exponentially in the last decade. Ten years ago, there were fewer than 500,000 electric vehicles on the roads across the whole world. In 2017, that number had increased to about 4 million, which grew to 6 million in 2018, 8 million in 2019, and 11 million in 2020—which saw a record year of EV sales despite the pandemic. Of the 11 million EVs, about half are on the road in China, over 3 million are in Europe, and 2 million are in the United States. [9]
Q. Are EVs cleaner than ICE vehicles even if electricity is produced by coal?
A. The level of carbon emissions savings from transferring from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles depends on the electricity mix. That said, battery electric vehicles are now so efficient that across the entire lifecycle they emit less carbon in every region in the world, even if the electricity mix relies for a large part on coal. As shown in Figure 1, total lifecycle emissions from EVs in Europe and the US are more than 60 percent less than from ICE vehicles. Because of more coal use, China’s and India’s emissions savings are lower but still positive: between 37–45 percent and 19–34 percent, respectively.[10]
Figure 1: Lifecycle GHG emissions of average medium-sized gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV) by year and region
Source: George Bieker, “A Global Comparison of the Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Combustion Engine and Electric Passenger Cars,” International Council on Clean Transportation, July 2021, https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Global-LCA-passenger-cars-jul2021_0.pdf.
Q. Are COP26 commitments sufficient for rapid decarbonization of the transport sector?
A. No. In 2020, 10 million out of approximately 11 million electric vehicles were passenger light-duty vehicles, with the remainder divided between light-commercial vehicles and electric busses.[11] The electrification of passenger vehicles is good news for decarbonization, since fuel demand for passenger vehicles accounts for the largest share of oil emissions, at about 3.3 gigatons (Gt) of carbon dioxide. However, there are fewer commercially available alternatives to decarbonize trucking, aviation, and shipping. In 2020, they accounted for the same amount of carbon dioxide emissions as passenger vehicles,[12] and while passenger transport is set to decarbonize as a result of EVs, oil demand for trucking, shipping, and aviation is expected to increase by 2030 to 4.1 Gt of CO2 emissions.
Q. Was anything agreed to at COP26 that could improve the decarbonization of trucking, shipping, and aviation?
A. Yes, albeit progress was more limited than with car and van fleets:
Notes
[5] https://ukcop26.org/cop26-declaration-on-accelerating-the-transition-to-100-zero-emission-cars-and-vans/
[6] https://ukcop26.org/cop26-declaration-on-accelerating-the-transition-to-100-zero-emission-cars-and-vans/
[7] https://ukcop26.org/cop26-declaration-on-accelerating-the-transition-to-100-zero-emission-cars-and-vans/
[15] https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/denmark-us-12-other-nations-back-tougher-climate-goal-shipping-2021-11-01/
This Energy Explained post represents the research and views of the author. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. The piece...
Pitting Western Canada against Eastern Canada is a terrible strategy for winning Trump’s trade war
Full report
Q&A by Tom Moerenhout • December 07, 2021