“Ce serait suicidaire” : pourquoi l’Europe redoute sa dépendance au gaz américain
Au rythme actuel, les Etats-Unis pourraient fournir 80 % du GNL dont les Européens ont besoin en 2030. Bien trop risqué dans un contexte géopolitique tendu.
Current Access Level “I” – ID Only: CUID holders, alumni, and approved guests only
Reports by David Sandalow • March 20, 2017
DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT [PDF]
A new report from the Center on Global Energy Policy analyzes whether the success of the oil and gas industry in raising capital could provide insights to help the solar and wind power industries expand. Authors Travis Bradford, Peter Davidson, Lawrence Rodman and David Sandalow explore the scale of the investment need in solar and wind power, sources of capital to date and similarities and differences between oil and gas assets and solar and wind power assets. Based on this analysis, they suggest three possible new financing tools for solar and wind power projects, drawn from the similar tools in the oil and gas sector:
Renewable resource based finance
Reserve based finance is an established tool for financing oil and gas development, with oil and gas reserves providing the asset base and security for loans. Based on this model, solar and wind resources at a project site could be evaluated for the potential to provide an asset base and security for debt financing.
Electricity production payments
Volumetric production payments are another established financing tool in the oil and gas sector, with capital providers making a development stage payment in exchange for the right to receive proceeds from future oil and gas production. Based on this model, capital providers could consider making current payments to fund solar and wind power project development in exchange for the right to receive proceeds from the future sale of solar or wind power at a site.
Capacity payment finance
In both the natural gas pipeline and electric utility industries, customers often pay for the right to use an asset when needed (a capacity payment). Capacity payments can be available for solar and wind power assets, subject to limitations, and could be considered as a separate revenue stream to help support debt financing.
Models can predict catastrophic or modest damages from climate change, but not which of these futures is coming.
On November 6, 2025, in the lead-up to the annual UN Conference of the Parties (COP30), the Center on Global Energy Policy (CGEP) at Columbia University SIPA convened a roundtable on project-based carbon credit markets (PCCMs) in São Paulo, Brazil—a country that both hosted this year’s COP and is well-positioned to shape the next phase of global carbon markets by leveraging its experience in nature-based solutions.
Connecticut needs an honest debate, and fresh thinking, to shape a climate strategy fit for today, not 2022.
Full report
Reports by David Sandalow • March 20, 2017