Defining and balancing energy sovereignty with national needs in an era of change
Discover how nations balance energy sovereignty with domestic economic needs, international trade, and technology partnerships on Energy Connects.
Commentary by • November 14, 2016
VIEW FULL COMMENTARY HERE [PDF]
On the four-year anniversary of Hurricane Sandy, which devastated communities along the Northeastern coast of the United States and caused significant power, fuel and transportation disruptions to millions of families and businesses in the Tri-State region, non-resident Fellow Robert Hallman writes that since the storm, considerable progress has been made to improve the resilience of the electric grid and prioritize power restoration to critical fuel supply infrastructure; however, as Hallman outlined in a another CGEP report, there is still an urgent need for local governments to do more.
Citing a projected increase in number and severity of extreme weather events (Hurricane Matthew being the most recent example), potential physical and cyber-attacks and aging infrastructure, Hallman notes that voluntary systems historically used by pubic officials for gathering critical real-time information simply cannot be relied on, especially during emergency conditions. The Tri-State area, and the country more broadly, needs regulatory programs which require owners and operators of critical fuel supply chain assets to prepare emergency response plans, conduct vulnerability assessments, and implement resiliency improvements.
Among his many recommendations, Hallman calls for: the establishment of secure channels of communication between the private and public sectors based on defined information sharing protocols; stringent reporting requirements for the fuel industry to better protect public health and limit economic loss during emergencies; improved regional cooperation and planning for fuel disruptions; and coordination with federal agencies like the Department of Energy to establish a permanent Energy Response and Operations Center.
Tatiana Mitrova, a fellow at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy and former energy scholar at Moscow’s Russian Academy of Sciences, and Sergey Vakulenko, an oil and gas expert at Carnegie’s Russia Eurasia Center, argue that Russia and Ukraine are locked in an energy war that has become an adaptation spiral, despite growing human and economic costs and despite current US pressure on Ukraine. They observe Ukraine’s remarkable ability to withstand Russian strikes, while questioning claims that long-range Ukrainian strikes will be able to achieve game-changing damage on Russia. Ukraine and Russia have transformed the role of energy warfare in modern conflict, drawing on low costs drones but also new forms of technological resilience that are likely to make wars longer and more dangerous.
The Hormuz crisis is the latest in a series of disruptions that have exposed the continent’s energy vulnerabilities. The time to build resilience is between crises, not during them.
Full report
Commentary by • November 14, 2016